Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Weighting for pairs versus triples #2

Open
m8pple opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Weighting for pairs versus triples #2

m8pple opened this issue Oct 16, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@m8pple
Copy link
Contributor

m8pple commented Oct 16, 2017

I am a student in your high-performance computing for engineers,
I'm just looking for clarification on whether groups of 3 will receive
stricter marking than groups of 2, thank you.

@m8pple
Copy link
Contributor Author

m8pple commented Oct 16, 2017

Yes, there will be an adjustment to compensate for the extra man-power in a pair versus a
triple. It was mentioned in the first lecture (about 55 minutes into the recording).

The primary reason for allowing pairs versus triples is to avoid the situation
where we would have all pairs except for one singleton, rather than to provide
any advantage. I still think pairs work better.

How the scaling works is specific to each of courseworks 5 and 6 - I'm not stating
the methods yet, as assessment should play no part in whether people form into twos
or threes (trying to avoid attempts to "optimise" for the system). I'll be saying something
about group formation in the next lecture.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant