[PROPOSAL] Fix HDF4 library naming / organizational scheme #409
derobins
started this conversation in
Proposed Change
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
PROBLEM
The Autotools and CMake have very different ideas about how to name and organize their output.
From the Autotools (shared/Java/XDR - Fortran built separately as static)
bin
lib
From CMake (shared/Fortran/Java/XDR)
bin
lib
Note the differences:
libhdf
vs Autotoolslibdf
PROPOSED FIX
HOW WOULD USERS BE AFFECTED?
PRO
➕ CMake and Autotools products would have identical names
➕ Autotools Fortran output would be more modern, more like HDF5 (support shared, easier to bring improvements over)
CON
➖ Some users may be unhappy with the new names
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions