Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generic Extension #4

Open
gerbsen opened this issue Jan 8, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Generic Extension #4

gerbsen opened this issue Jan 8, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@gerbsen
Copy link

gerbsen commented Jan 8, 2014

Hi,
first of all thank you for this sweet library. It worked very well so far.
My observation while using this tool was, that it seemed very much tailored towards a specific kind of shape files.
I have shape files with lots of data columns (sorry not sure about the correct terminology), but this tool can only handle two features like "name" and "type".
Is there any extension planned which is able to handle a multitude of features?

So far I've cloned the project and edited it to my needs (i don't think it's possible to merge this again), but a more generic version (possible in maven :)) would be very cool.

Cheers,
Daniel

@KostasPatroumpas
Copy link
Member

Daniel,

Daniel, thanks a lot for your feedback and kind remarks.

Regarding your question: By now, our main concern for TripleGeo was to extract geographic features as RDF triples along with some basic descriptive information (identifiers, names, types). Support for more thematic attributes (i.e., data columns) is among our plans for a future release (hopefully in a few months).

@Aklakan
Copy link
Member

Aklakan commented Jan 29, 2014

Hi, so as discussed at the GeoKnow Year 1 Review Meeting, I suggest that we factor out the R2RML and SML parsers (and possibly the corresponding RowMapper classes) from Sparqlify into a separate project, so that TripleGeo can readily re-use them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants