Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bad names for fields in quality model #43

Open
GeneralMine opened this issue Jul 6, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Bad names for fields in quality model #43

GeneralMine opened this issue Jul 6, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
Fraunhofer If the issue has to be discussed with Fraunhofer Priority: Low Low priority to work on

Comments

@GeneralMine
Copy link
Owner

GeneralMine commented Jul 6, 2021 •
edited
Loading

The naming of every field e.g. "Feld 3" in the quality model view is bad and not informing. Might talk to Jens if we can find better names.
@GeneralMine GeneralMine added the Priority: Low Low priority to work on label Jul 6, 2021
@GeneralMine GeneralMine changed the title Fieldnames in qualitymodel bad Bad names for fields in quality model Jul 18, 2021
@GeneralMine GeneralMine added the Fraunhofer If the issue has to be discussed with Fraunhofer label Jul 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Fraunhofer If the issue has to be discussed with Fraunhofer Priority: Low Low priority to work on
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GeneralMine