You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At first glance, these problems have a lot in common.
In fact, I think it may ultimately make sense to include 2D turbulence in BarotropicQG, at least for the purposes of the GeophysicalFlows package. In GeophysicalFlow, 2D turbulence certainly is a type of barotropic QG flow.
Let's discuss the specific pros and cons. I'm not sure what is meant by the inclusion being 'cumbersome', but I do see some pros in avoiding the duplication of functions that calculate things like energy and enstrophy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Continuing the discussion from FourierFlows issue #72.
At first glance, these problems have a lot in common.
In fact, I think it may ultimately make sense to include 2D turbulence in BarotropicQG, at least for the purposes of the GeophysicalFlows package. In GeophysicalFlow, 2D turbulence certainly is a type of barotropic QG flow.
Let's discuss the specific pros and cons. I'm not sure what is meant by the inclusion being 'cumbersome', but I do see some pros in avoiding the duplication of functions that calculate things like energy and enstrophy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: