Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Django from 1.5 to 1.6 or 1.7 #380

Open
btbonval opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Upgrade Django from 1.5 to 1.6 or 1.7 #380

btbonval opened this issue Jan 9, 2015 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@btbonval
Copy link
Member

btbonval commented Jan 9, 2015

1.5 is no longer supported by the Django team.

@yourcelf has experience upgrading from 1.5 to 1.6. It might be wise to push all the way to 1.7 while the pushing is good.

@btbonval
Copy link
Member Author

btbonval commented Jan 9, 2015

See also #263

@sethwoodworth
Copy link
Member

Jumping to 1.7 involves dropping south and using django's new built-in
migrations. That probably isn't a problem, but it is worth knowing this so
you update all dev, staging and deployment databases with the latest
migrations before the changeover.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Bryan Bonvallet [email protected]
wrote:

See also #263 #263


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#380 (comment)
.

@btbonval
Copy link
Member Author

btbonval commented Jan 9, 2015

Thanks for the heads up @sethwoodworth . @yourcelf made a similar comment, which is why we're still unsure whether to take it all the way to 1.7 or stop at 1.6 for the time being.

Ultimately, those changes will have to get made sometime, unless 1.6 ends up being a long term release.

@sethwoodworth
Copy link
Member

I just upgraded an app from 1.5 to 1.6 and it was painless. So long as you
run your migrations from south before you upgrade, the upgrade should be
kosher. But if you ever want to restore an old db ('meh' imo) it might get
a bit hairy. But that should at most ever happen once, if it ever happens
at all.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Bryan Bonvallet [email protected]
wrote:

Thanks for the heads up @sethwoodworth https://github.com/sethwoodworth
. @yourcelf https://github.com/yourcelf made a similar comment, which
is why we're still unsure whether to take it all the way to 1.7 or stop at
1.6 for the time being.

Ultimately, those changes will have to get made sometime, unless 1.6 ends
up being a long term release.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#380 (comment)
.

@AndrewMagliozzi
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the input, Seth.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Seth Woodworth [email protected]
wrote:

I just upgraded an app from 1.5 to 1.6 and it was painless. So long as you
run your migrations from south before you upgrade, the upgrade should be
kosher. But if you ever want to restore an old db ('meh' imo) it might get
a bit hairy. But that should at most ever happen once, if it ever happens
at all.

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Bryan Bonvallet [email protected]

wrote:

Thanks for the heads up @sethwoodworth https://github.com/sethwoodworth

. @yourcelf https://github.com/yourcelf made a similar comment, which
is why we're still unsure whether to take it all the way to 1.7 or stop
at
1.6 for the time being.

Ultimately, those changes will have to get made sometime, unless 1.6
ends
up being a long term release.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
<
https://github.com/FinalsClub/karmaworld/issues/380#issuecomment-69385623>

.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#380 (comment)
.

@btbonval btbonval self-assigned this Apr 21, 2015
@btbonval
Copy link
Member Author

This is something that might be done in parallel with #426 . Migrating to a new stack could mean a lot of changes to the Heroku environment. Upgrading the version of Django at the same time sounds smart.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants