Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEDCOM 5.5.1 spec syntax errors #579

Open
dthaler opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

GEDCOM 5.5.1 spec syntax errors #579

dthaler opened this issue Dec 15, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@dthaler
Copy link
Collaborator

dthaler commented Dec 15, 2024

MULTIMEDIA_LINK:=
 n OBJE @<XREF:OBJE>@                 {1:1} p.26
 |
 n OBJE
 +1 FILE <MULTIMEDIA_FILE_REFN>       {1:M} p.54
 ...

The second OBJE is missing the cardinality, presumably {1:1}.

FAMILY_EVENT_STRUCTURE:=
 [
 n [ ANUL | CENS | DIV | DIVF ]       {1:1}
 +1 <<FAMILY_EVENT_DETAIL>>           {0:1} p.32
 ...
 |
 n RESI
 +1 <<FAMILY_EVENT_DETAIL>>           {0:1} p.32

RESI is missing the cardinality, presumably {1:1}.

Not sure what we want to do about 5.5.1 spec syntax errors. Have an errata document?

@tychonievich
Copy link
Collaborator

Not sure what we want to do about 5.5.1 spec syntax errors. Have an errata document?

Per #52, I think that the PDFs we have are derivatives, not the originals, and thus that there's no compelling reason not to replace them with fixed derivatives as long as doing so doesn't change the spec.

@dthaler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dthaler commented Dec 17, 2024

Discussing in GEDCOM Steering Committee 17 DEC 2024:

  • The current PDF for 5.5.1 was generated by @chronoplexsoftware and then updated by the committee for title, copyright, and contact info.
  • The committee will generate an updated PDF with these two omissions corrected.

@chronoplexsoftware
Copy link

The current PDF for 5.5.1 was generated by @chronoplexsoftware and then updated by the committee for title, copyright, and contact info.

Just for clarity, we generated derivate PDF versions of GEDCOM 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 5.3, and 5.4.

The copy of the 5.5.1 draft from 1999 we host, is, as far as we can tell, an unmodified original. We had no role in generating the PDF for the 5.5.1 release in 2019. The errors noted by the OP occur in both documents.

image

@dthaler
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dthaler commented Dec 17, 2024

Thanks @chronoplexsoftware for the clarification! The committee was able to find Word document source for the 5.5.1 PDF so we can generate a corrected PDF.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants