Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support additional instance types for local zones c5d #16

Open
JeffGiroux opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Support additional instance types for local zones c5d #16

JeffGiroux opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@JeffGiroux
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem?

Yes, inability to deploy to c5d instance type.

Describe the solution you'd like

User needs to deploy BIG-IP to local zone and templates should support the instance types in the local zone in order to support such deployment. AWS offers local zones. Those local zones have limited AWS service and limited instance types.

Reference - https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/global-infrastructure/localzones/features/?nc=sn&loc=2

Notice Phoenix for example lists T3 and C5D instance types. Not only do the templates not support the instance type (sure, you can edit template) but the AMIs themselves by F5 vendor do not support c5d.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Testing with t3 instances, but max size supported in Phoenix is t3.medium and customer needs bigger scale.

Additional context

Cannot architect into local zone with BIG-IP using high performing instance types.

@shyawnkarim
Copy link

Thanks for reporting this issue and for providing a link to info on Local Zones. This enhancement is being tracked internally with ID ESECLDTPLT-3045.

@shyawnkarim shyawnkarim added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2022
@shyawnkarim shyawnkarim added this to the backlog milestone Apr 5, 2022
@shyawnkarim
Copy link

The failover templates only use across-az so local zones would only be applicable to the Quickstarts. Is this what you are looking for?

@JeffGiroux
Copy link
Author

yes, that works...standalone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants