You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, stats_half_start and stats_half_end are called for each packet. In my testing, this accounts for ~13% of ettercap's processing time. If we were to sample once every 100 packets rather than once per packet, we'd significantly reduce it's impact upon Ettercap's performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@justfalter: Can you check #449 which request to merge the proposed change.
I've done a test case. Despite the bad throughput performance of Ettercap in general, it seems your promising idea didn't work out.
Could you please have a look. Maybe I've done something wrong.
Thanks.
Right now, stats_half_start and stats_half_end are called for each packet. In my testing, this accounts for ~13% of ettercap's processing time. If we were to sample once every 100 packets rather than once per packet, we'd significantly reduce it's impact upon Ettercap's performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: