We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What is the criteria for a successful PR review? From a more practical perspective, what are the actual steps?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're also noting that some classes, such as estuary have axioms that can be reasoned over. Is there a preferred reasoner to use when checking logic?
estuary
Sorry, something went wrong.
The general guidance should also include an obsolescence workflow (xref #192)
Group discussion suggests using all reasoners (e.g., elk, pellet, Hermit, Fact).
Group discussion suggests that the solution to #192 be used in general to deal with obsolescence.
No branches or pull requests
What is the criteria for a successful PR review?
From a more practical perspective, what are the actual steps?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: