Use MOD to annotate datasets in COR

[rduerr]

Annotations of ontologies are an issue, since different repositories use different standards. It has been suggested that the MOD-Ontology might be a common way forward for everyone. If agreement is reached across repositories please implement. See also #59.

[graybeal]

Why was this closed? Reopening on the assumption it was an accident.

[lewismc]

Thanks @graybeal

... If agreement is reached across repositories please implement.

I have no idea who is seeking agreement or where they are seeking it... based on that I made a determination to close. @rduerr can you please enlighten us? Thank you

Let's bring this up at the next COR meeting. Thanks @graybeal

[graybeal]

It was created long ago but is still a valid request. The request about implementing if an agreement is reached was a path, not a requirement. Will take up at next call.

[graybeal]

Summary of MOD progress just presented at FAIR Convergence (by Alexandra Kokkinaki on behalf of RDA VSSIG):

As any data, semantic resources (ontologies, thesaurus, vocabularies)…. need to be FAIR
https://doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1115343.1
Assessing the Practice of Ontology Metadata: A Survey
https://hal-lirmm.ccsd.cnrs.fr/lirmm-02315001
MOD1.4: A metadata vocabulary for ontology description and publication
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70863-8_17
Harnessing the power of unified metadata in an ontology repository: the case of AgroPortal
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-018-0091-5

MOD2.0: a DCAT2 extension/profile for semantic artefact

[brandonnodnarb]

also, MOD2 is here: https://github.com/sifrproject/MOD-Ontology