-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get ERI test to pass #201
Comments
The runs are actually bit-for-bit, but the failure is coming from something funny in the comparison script.
I think the 5 files it compares are all identical
but there are three files that are not compared:
I see two differences when comparing to an ERS test:
I'll add this issue to the agenda for the next CSEG meeting, it sure feels like a problem with the test suite rather than anything on the MOM6 side. |
I don't know if this is helpful, but for CISM (and maybe other components), we needed to introduce this in CIME to skip trying to compare some non-standard files that are written out at initialization: https://github.com/ESMCI/cime/blob/16ff8d7754925f05cdd86e86791481a3d54a2f6d/CIME/hist_utils.py#L326 https://github.com/ESMCI/cime/blob/16ff8d7754925f05cdd86e86791481a3d54a2f6d/CIME/hist_utils.py#L334 |
We should be able to configure a hybrid start to look like an exact restart and pass the
COMPARE_base_hybrid
phase of an ERI test. This would leave the PET test as the only remaining expected failureThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: