Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Allow Bridge Creation without Satellites #230

Open
tjirab opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[FEATURE] Allow Bridge Creation without Satellites #230

tjirab opened this issue Apr 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature This is is requesting a new feature

Comments

@tjirab
Copy link

tjirab commented Apr 16, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently the bridge macro requires effectivity satellite table details to be declared. Not all hubs and links come with a satellite node, therefore it would be nice for the macro to work without satellite details.

Describe the solution you'd like
Optional dependency of effectivity satellites in bridge creation.

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A.

Additional context
This would likely affect the behavior in bridge_shared and potentially bridge.sql.

Docs: tut_bridges

AB#5343

@tjirab tjirab added the feature This is is requesting a new feature label Apr 16, 2024
@DVAlexHiggs
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this request. This will be a feature implemented in our upcoming bridge re-work. We'll keep you updated!

@DVAlexHiggs
Copy link
Member

DVAlexHiggs commented Jun 7, 2024

Hello!
With the release of v0.11.0 today you may have seen we've deprecated the bridge() macro.
I just wanted to assure you not to panic about this! This is the first step to our planned re-work, which will still include this feature, among others.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature This is is requesting a new feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants