-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How about make Crane release package into single image? #418
Comments
alpine as base image can reduce some size. |
Mildly offtopic, tangentially related to image size: How are speeds for docker hub in China these days? Last time I visited I noticed that they were bad enough to warrant a "China Docker Hub." Is there such a thing? I suppose if not, it's a pretty solid startup concept.... |
@faddat Docker announce china development news: "Docker Announces Expansion To China Through Commercial Partnership With Alibaba Cloud", so the speed is not issue currently. |
That's really great news! |
可以自定义端口号吗 |
@khs1994 yeap in the env_file |
For now Crane installation is easy enough by only one line of bash command, but it occupy 4 containers MySQL, Crane Api, Crane frontend and Registry respectively, the total size of images upto 1G, need to improve but here is what I think
1, make all components into one single image/container, this is simple but lack the flexibility if user want make there own version.
2, leave the deployment/installation decision to Crane users, they can choose what DB to use, how to serve static files and how to connect a registry(Crane version or Private registry setup by themselves)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: