Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create an .md page for State-level voter registration #28

Open
rachelanddata opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 10 comments
Open

Create an .md page for State-level voter registration #28

rachelanddata opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@rachelanddata
Copy link
Collaborator

As part of the voter accessibility project, we would like to collect the voter registration process for each State in an .md file. For example:

Colorado: Online (with drivers license), mail-in, and in-person registration
Texas: Register by mail-in application (must have ink signature of applicant) only within county of residence

Definition of Done: All states (including D.C.) are documented with their voter registration process.

@epetenko
Copy link

epetenko commented Feb 7, 2017

I can take a shot at this for New Jersey, for a start.

@chrisdick14
Copy link
Contributor

Awesome! Please edit the README and submit a pull request when you add the info.

@decodyng
Copy link

decodyng commented Feb 16, 2017

Question: While we're in the process of gathering this data, might it be better to store in some kind of structured format, instead of just in sentences? Then we could plausibly have a .md file automatically generated off of or alongside that structured data. (Thoughts, @chrisdick14 ?)

Also, I might take a stab at this, for it has been quiet for 8 days, and I am new to the project and somewhat overwhelmed by the main R thread, but would like to jump on the bus.

@rachelanddata
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We can absolutely turn this into a structured format. My thought initially was there would be many different dimensions around voter registration for all states and therefore commonality may be difficult. But, we can always add dimensions to the table as they arise. For now I see a structure like: State and StateAbbr along with indicators: OnlineReg,MailReg,AutoReg,VoterID

@chrisdick14
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with @rachelanddata. If you would like to take stab, why don't you start with a structure like she noted, but feel free to add new indicators if it becomes necessary.

@epetenko
Copy link

I can contribute more states when I have time as well. But I'm wondering if that structured data set doesn't exist online somewhere. I've been hunting.

@epetenko
Copy link

epetenko commented Feb 16, 2017

@i found a list of states that have online voter registration, including links to the registration site: http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/electronic-or-online-voter-registration.aspx
I created a quick Online_registration.xlsx (sans links) and html table scrape (with links) and will try to get those links into a structured format when I can.

Edit: Here's the list with links: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TzdHZdkz7z6HEEi3KgPTtllKhAQIsFn47WD0DYtGSkE/edit?usp=sharing

@chrisdick14
Copy link
Contributor

Perfect. You can also use the link that epetenko noted above to get started.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 14, 2017

Hi all, passionate newbie looking to get my feet wet, and was happy to see this data generation issue as it is right up my alley. :-) I've created a python script that scrapes online and same-day voter registration data from ballotpedia pages, and, it appears that all states have mail in registration as there's a federal mail in voter registration form.

I'm working on finishing the script up to generate the markup data for each state and output the data to both csv and md for further use, and I hope to be able to submit a pull request within a few days.

I think there's a chance that I got ahead of myself though...was I supposed to get assigned to the issue first?

Sincere apologies for diving in before communicating!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 16, 2017

Ready for review - #53

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants