Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different NA12892 HLA results from tutorial #85

Open
Tesson98 opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Different NA12892 HLA results from tutorial #85

Tesson98 opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Tesson98
Copy link

Hi @chbe-helix

I hope this find you well.
When trying to repeat the tutorial HLA typing results with ILMN/NA12892 sample, I got the outputfile named "assembly_graph-hla.NA12892_extracted_1_fq_gz-hla-extracted-1_fq.report" and the output was as follows, which was diffrent from tutorials (https://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat-genotype/tutorials/#interpreting-output) but the same as results mentioned in issues #11:

`

    # VERSIONS:
    # HISAT2 - 2.2.1
    # HISAT-genotype - 1.3.2
    # Database - Database /dssg/home/acct-medzwli/medzwli/Tesson_main/Softwares/hisatgenotype/indicies/hla derived from HISATgenotype DB version: NONE
    # COMMAND:/dssg/home/acct-medzwli/medzwli/Tesson_main/Softwares/hisatgenotype/hisatgenotype --base hla --locus-list A -1 ILMN/NA12892.extracted.1.fq.gz -2 ILMN/NA12892.extracted.2.fq.gz --threads 16

	hisat2 graph
		1496 reads and 769 pairs are aligned
			1 A*02:01:01:01 (count: 419)
			2 A*02:251 (count: 407)
			3 A*02:610:02 (count: 405)
			4 A*02:524:02 (count: 403)
			5 A*02:650 (count: 403)
			6 A*02:01:123 (count: 402)
			7 A*02:647 (count: 401)
			8 A*02:01:126 (count: 400)
			9 A*02:562 (count: 400)
			10 A*02:645 (count: 400)


			1 ranked A*02:01:01:01 (abundance: 51.95%)
			2 ranked A*11:01:01:01 (abundance: 48.05%)

`

Was my output correct?

Thank you so much!

Tesson,
2024.10.19

@Tesson98
Copy link
Author

Additional,
If I tried to do MHC-I and MHC-II genotyping with ILMN/NA12892 sample, I got 100% abudance in DQB1 and DRB1 allele genes. For those genes, should I directly treated them as homozygous? For example, if I get "1 ranked DRB101:01:01 (abundance: 100.00%)" and "1 ranked DQB105:01:01:03 (abundance: 100.00%)", the DRB1 and DQB1 genotypes of this sample were DRB101:01:01-DRB101:01:01 and DQB105:01:01:03-DQB105:01:01:03 ?
The output was as follows:
`

    # VERSIONS:
     # HISAT2 - 2.2.1
     # HISAT-genotype - 1.3.2
     # Database - Database /dssg/home/acct-medzwli/medzwli/Tesson_main/Softwares/hisatgenotype/indicies/hla derived from HISATgenotype DB version: NONE
     # COMMAND:/dssg/home/acct-medzwli/medzwli/Tesson_main/Softwares/hisatgenotype/hisatgenotype --base hla -v --locus-list A,B,C,DPA1,DPB1,DPB2,DQA1,DQB1,DRA,DRB1,DRB5 -1 ILMN/NA12892.extracted.1.fq.gz -2 ILMN/NA12892.extracted.2.fq.gz --out-dir out

	hisat2 graph
		4377 reads and 2247 pairs are aligned
			1 DPA1*01:03:01:03 (count: 1556)
			2 DPA1*01:03:01:02 (count: 1536)
			3 DPA1*02:01:01:02 (count: 1497)
			4 DPA1*01:03:01:04 (count: 1482)
			5 DPA1*02:01:01:01 (count: 1438)
			6 DPA1*02:01:08 (count: 1395)
			7 DPA1*01:03:01:05 (count: 1386)
			8 DPA1*02:01:02 (count: 1372)
			9 DPA1*01:03:01:01 (count: 1337)
			10 DPA1*01:03:05 (count: 1320)


			1 ranked DPA1*02:01:01:02 (abundance: 52.97%)
			2 ranked DPA1*01:03:01:01 (abundance: 34.00%)
			3 ranked DPA1*02:01:01:01 (abundance: 7.80%)
			4 ranked DPA1*01:03:01:03 (abundance: 5.24%)
		5901 reads and 2987 pairs are aligned
			1 DPB1*03:01:01 (count: 2654)
			2 DPB1*45:01 (count: 2599)
			3 DPB1*104:01 (count: 2177)
			4 DPB1*16:01:01 (count: 2139)
			5 DPB1*463:01 (count: 2120)
			6 DPB1*584:01 (count: 1676)
			7 DPB1*40:01 (count: 1100)
			8 DPB1*398:01 (count: 889)
			9 DPB1*04:01:31 (count: 878)
			10 DPB1*04:01:01:01 (count: 877)


			1 ranked DPB1*06:01:01 (abundance: 50.56%)
			2 ranked DPB1*14:01:01 (abundance: 49.44%)
		9389 reads and 4743 pairs are aligned
			1 DPB2*01:01:01 (count: 3670)
			2 DPB2*03:01:01:03 (count: 2878)
			3 DPB2*02:01 (count: 2578)
			4 DPB2*03:01:01:01 (count: 2266)
			5 DPB2*03:01:01:02 (count: 2238)
			6 DPB2*01:01:02 (count: 1970)


			1 ranked DPB2*01:01:01 (abundance: 69.06%)
			2 ranked DPB2*01:01:02 (abundance: 22.72%)
			3 ranked DPB2*03:01:01:01 (abundance: 4.50%)
			4 ranked DPB2*03:01:01:02 (abundance: 3.72%)
		3313 reads and 1681 pairs are aligned
			1 DQA1*01:01:02 (count: 1458)
			2 DQA1*01:01:01:03 (count: 1432)
			3 DQA1*01:01:01:01 (count: 1401)
			4 DQA1*01:01:01:02 (count: 1390)
			5 DQA1*01:05:01 (count: 743)
			6 DQA1*01:04:01:02 (count: 729)
			7 DQA1*01:04:01:01 (count: 728)
			8 DQA1*01:04:01:04 (count: 665)
			9 DQA1*01:07Q (count: 664)
			10 DQA1*01:04:01:03 (count: 654)


			1 ranked DQA1*01:01:01:03 (abundance: 76.27%)
			2 ranked DQA1*01:01:01:01 (abundance: 23.73%)
		3547 reads and 1795 pairs are aligned
			1 DQB1*05:01:01:03 (count: 1795)
			2 DQB1*05:103 (count: 1748)
			3 DQB1*05:01:01:02 (count: 1746)
			4 DQB1*05:104 (count: 1744)
			5 DQB1*05:01:01:01 (count: 1681)
			6 DQB1*05:52 (count: 1027)
			7 DQB1*05:02:01 (count: 1010)
			8 DQB1*05:97 (count: 1010)
			9 DQB1*05:03:01:01 (count: 1009)
			10 DQB1*05:106 (count: 996)


			1 ranked DQB1*05:01:01:03 (abundance: 100.00%)
		3048 reads and 1532 pairs are aligned
			1 DRA*01:01:02 (count: 1007)
			2 DRA*01:02:01 (count: 904)
			3 DRA*01:02:02 (count: 886)
			4 DRA*01:01:01:02 (count: 802)
			5 DRA*01:01:01:03 (count: 790)
			6 DRA*01:01:01:01 (count: 742)
			7 DRA*01:02:03 (count: 616)


			1 ranked DRA*01:02:01 (abundance: 69.11%)
			2 ranked DRA*01:01:02 (abundance: 30.89%)
		5514 reads and 2794 pairs are aligned
			1 DRB1*01:01:01 (count: 2746)
			2 DRB1*01:02:01 (count: 2561)
			3 DRB1*01:03 (count: 2301)
			4 DRB1*12:17 (count: 1717)
			5 DRB1*16:01:01 (count: 408)
			6 DRB1*16:02:01:02 (count: 408)
			7 DRB1*16:02:01:01 (count: 360)
			8 DRB1*15:02:01:02 (count: 300)
			9 DRB1*15:02:01:01 (count: 298)
			10 DRB1*15:01:01:02 (count: 240)


			1 ranked DRB1*01:01:01 (abundance: 100.00%)

`
Thanks again and hope for your reply!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant