Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Speed Benchmarks for morphological operations #171

Open
ogencoglu opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Speed Benchmarks for morphological operations #171

ogencoglu opened this issue Nov 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
component:DIPlib About the DIPlib library (C++ code) enhancement help wanted

Comments

@ogencoglu
Copy link

Would be useful to have an understanding of run-time performance of the most common morphological operations such as

  • erosion
  • dilation
  • thinning
  • closing
  • opening
  • skeletonization
    etc. with respect to other popular libraries such as:
  • opencv
  • scikit-image
  • scipy.ndimage
  • fastmorph
  • imops
@crisluengo crisluengo added help wanted component:DIPlib About the DIPlib library (C++ code) labels Nov 24, 2024
@crisluengo
Copy link
Member

Sure, that would be nice.

Here’s some comparisons with scikit-image: https://github.com/grlee77/uskimage-demo?tab=readme-ov-file#2d-results

At the bottom of this page there is a comparison of the dilation with OpenCV: https://www.crisluengo.net/archives/1140/

Here’s a comparison of the median filter with OpenCV and scikit-image: https://www.crisluengo.net/archives/1138/

I’ve also done some comparisons of the dilation with MATLAB’s Image Processing Toolbox: https://www.crisluengo.net/archives/885/

It would be great if you or someone else did a more thorough comparison across libraries and algorithms!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:DIPlib About the DIPlib library (C++ code) enhancement help wanted
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants