Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accept {{token.name}} variable in effect description #24

Open
weepingminotaur opened this issue Apr 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Accept {{token.name}} variable in effect description #24

weepingminotaur opened this issue Apr 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request tracked Issue created in separate board

Comments

@weepingminotaur
Copy link

Right now, if you use {{token.name}} in a Dfreds Convenient Effects effect, it renders properly in chat (shows the token's actual name) for the condition. But the text description in Effects Panel shows {{token.name}} instead of the creature's name, which is a bit ugly. Would be great if the effect description accepted that variable!

@weepingminotaur weepingminotaur added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 17, 2022
@DFreds
Copy link
Owner

DFreds commented Apr 18, 2022

Interesting. I don't have official support for that first use case anyway, so I guess something is doing that. I'll see about adding it to the effects panel though

@DFreds
Copy link
Owner

DFreds commented Apr 18, 2022

Do you have an example of using {{token.name}} in CE? It doesn't seem to be working for me

@weepingminotaur
Copy link
Author

Hmm. I may have confused CE with the regular AE effect description box, which accepts {{token.name}} as a variable. Screenshot attached.
Screen Shot 2022-04-18 at 4 06 16 PM

@DFreds DFreds added the tracked Issue created in separate board label Feb 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request tracked Issue created in separate board
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants