We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Locally I'm testing the two optimization modes with wasm-opt version 110:
$ wasm-opt --help … -Os execute default optimization passes, focusing on code size -Oz execute default optimization passes, super-focusing on code size …
For my tests, there is a difference in the order of magnitute of 1-2%:
# -Os -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 192130 16 Okt 17:27 nois_demo.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 480903 16 Okt 17:27 nois_oracle.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 225705 16 Okt 17:27 nois_proxy.wasm # -Oz -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 189263 16 Okt 17:29 nois_demo.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 472586 16 Okt 17:29 nois_oracle.wasm -rwxr-xr-x 1 me staff 223632 16 Okt 17:29 nois_proxy.wasm
So for now I don't see a strong need to move away from the well established -Os.
-Os
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some more example numbers from https://twitter.com/const_amit/status/1752210883156062660:
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Locally I'm testing the two optimization modes with wasm-opt version 110:
For my tests, there is a difference in the order of magnitute of 1-2%:
So for now I don't see a strong need to move away from the well established
-Os
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: