You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the DigitalConnector can integrate/ aggregate data at specified spatial granularity (eg. LSOA level, ward level etc.), and can aggregate data with spatial operation. It would be good if the integration process is more transparent, so that users can see how the data are aggregated.
Also, for data aggregation, especailly for data at property, postcode level to aggregated to Census output area level (the building block of UK statistical system), there could be differnet ways of data aggregation. The data can be aggregated differently accroding to different needs. It might be good to show the data agregation transparently, so that data can be more effectively communicated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
steven4320555
changed the title
Transparency vs. Efficiency
Transparency on data aggregation
Mar 18, 2018
Currently, the DigitalConnector can integrate/ aggregate data at specified spatial granularity (eg. LSOA level, ward level etc.), and can aggregate data with spatial operation. It would be good if the integration process is more transparent, so that users can see how the data are aggregated.
Also, for data aggregation, especailly for data at property, postcode level to aggregated to Census output area level (the building block of UK statistical system), there could be differnet ways of data aggregation. The data can be aggregated differently accroding to different needs. It might be good to show the data agregation transparently, so that data can be more effectively communicated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: