Thank you for this implementation

[chenyzh28]

I run the training code and test the performance of BiseNet-v1 and BiseNet-v2. The single mIOU is 75.30% for v1 and 74.18% for v2. As for the FPS, I didn't turn the model into tensorrt but directly use demo.py to test for 1000 iterations. I also remove the auxilary segmentation heads for computational efficiency. Finally, the FPS is 58.32 (768-1536) for v1 and 115 (512-1024) for v2, which is a litter inferior to the papers.
Thanks @CoinCheung for your work, which is very enlightening.
My implementation environment is as follows:
Python 3.7
torh 1.6.0
torchvision 0.7.0
cuda 10.1

[CoinCheung]

Thanks for sharing this !!

Please note that, in order to be compatible with tensorrt 7.0, I replaced interpolation with pixel-shuffle operation, which requires the previous conv layers to have more filters. This would bring more parameter and slow down the model a little bit. If python satisfies you, you can remove these pixel-shuffles and use interpolate back, which in theory would make the model more lightweighted.

[chenyzh28]

Thank you! I have noticed that!
But recently I found another problem that I can't specify GPUs, which is very weird.
For example, when I run CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=4,5 python -m torch.distributed.launch --nproc_per_node=2 tools/train.py --model bisenetv2, the program still runs on GPU 6,7.
I also tried setting os.environ["CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES"] = '4,5', but the problem still exists.
This problem has bothered me for two days. I don't really understand the working mechanism of torch.distributed.launch, so please advise me if you see any problems. Thanks!

[chenyzh28]

It is an import problem. I have solved it.

[CoinCheung]

Good to know that your solved your problem, I left this open so that other people can see your performance test result.

[huohuotm]

I run the training code and test the performance of BiseNet-v1 and BiseNet-v2. The single mIOU is 75.30% for v1 and 74.18% for v2. As for the FPS, I didn't turn the model into tensorrt but directly use demo.py to test for 1000 iterations. I also remove the auxilary segmentation heads for computational efficiency. Finally, the FPS is 58.32 (768-1536) for v1 and 115 (512-1024) for v2, which is a litter inferior to the papers.
Thanks @CoinCheung for your work, which is very enlightening.
My implementation environment is as follows:
Python 3.7
torh 1.6.0
torchvision 0.7.0
cuda 10.1

May I ask which GPU you use to get "115 (512-1024) for v2 "?

[Asuna88]

I run the training code and test the performance of BiseNet-v1 and BiseNet-v2. The single mIOU is 75.30% for v1 and 74.18% for v2. As for the FPS, I didn't turn the model into tensorrt but directly use demo.py to test for 1000 iterations. I also remove the auxilary segmentation heads for computational efficiency. Finally, the FPS is 58.32 (768-1536) for v1 and 115 (512-1024) for v2, which is a litter inferior to the papers. Thanks @CoinCheung for your work, which is very enlightening. My implementation environment is as follows: Python 3.7 torh 1.6.0 torchvision 0.7.0 cuda 10.1

用的哪张卡得到的 115FPS？
1080Ti？ 还是3070 Ti.

报告FPS的时候，麻烦请说明卡的类型哈，这样更有意义。
谢谢~