From 886a4d676cd9784067311ba1b7c122eca84cb621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Claudiu Creanga Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 11:59:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] new --- _posts/2024-12-01-rise-frustrated-LLM-programmer.md | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/_posts/2024-12-01-rise-frustrated-LLM-programmer.md b/_posts/2024-12-01-rise-frustrated-LLM-programmer.md index 8b87db5..d097b8a 100644 --- a/_posts/2024-12-01-rise-frustrated-LLM-programmer.md +++ b/_posts/2024-12-01-rise-frustrated-LLM-programmer.md @@ -11,11 +11,14 @@ domains like law and accounting to closely related fields such as data analysis. makes the barrier of entry into programming a lot lower. This is done at the expense of the job satisfactions of these LLM programmers. What I see is a painful continuous daily -banging of heads against the chatGPT wall. They ask for a programming solution and the LLM gives an answer which is 99% there, but doesn't -actually work, and then they copy the error into chatGPT, which again gives a wrong answer and then again and again. Not interested in learning python, +banging of heads against the chatGPT wall. They ask for a programming solution and the LLM gives an answer which is 90% there, but doesn't +actually work, and then they copy the error into chatGPT, which again gives a wrong answer and then again and again. The AI could fix the +current issue, but it will break 2 other things. One step forward, two steps back. Not interested in learning python, the LLM programmer cannot escape the loop. Which leads to frustration and a lower job satisfaction for many. Programming is a skill, not knowledge, and can't be learned like you learn about WW2. It is a craft, learned through practice, not a theory to be memorized. You need to learn programming by doing it with your hands many months, which is time that the LLM programmer doesn't have. +AI does help mid and senior software engineers, who know how to get from 90% to 100% by themselves, but it is a frustrating tool for junior developers. +