You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While extending OnAccessIncludePath to cover as much of the Linux filesystem as possible, finer granularity than the currently used OnAccessExcludePath is required. I. e. one objective of this Ansible Role is to achieve feature parity with commercial anti malware products. Hence it would be beneficial for clamonacc flexibility if it was possible to apply a finer set of exclusion rules. The feature is requested for RHEL7 / Kernel 3.10
Examples of Exlusions
Filename (i.e. underwhateverpath.log)
File Path (i.e. /usr/lib64/ld-2.33.so)
File Suffix (i.e. *.log)
Proposed Feature Addition
All the above exclusions could be addressed using regex. Implementation of a configuration parameter i.e. OnAccessExcludeRegex would greatly improve granularity for exclusions for clamonacc.
Funding
Our customer is FOSS aware and will most likely require finer granularity for clamonacc to pass evaluation. Please advice if you know of a commercial developer who can offer a pricetag for the implementation. We'll be happy to arrange for funding and I welcome any help we get.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature Request
While extending
OnAccessIncludePath
to cover as much of the Linux filesystem as possible, finer granularity than the currently usedOnAccessExcludePath
is required. I. e. one objective of this Ansible Role is to achieve feature parity with commercial anti malware products. Hence it would be beneficial forclamonacc
flexibility if it was possible to apply a finer set of exclusion rules. The feature is requested for RHEL7 / Kernel 3.10Examples of Exlusions
Proposed Feature Addition
All the above exclusions could be addressed using regex. Implementation of a configuration parameter i.e.
OnAccessExcludeRegex
would greatly improve granularity for exclusions forclamonacc
.Funding
Our customer is FOSS aware and will most likely require finer granularity for
clamonacc
to pass evaluation. Please advice if you know of a commercial developer who can offer a pricetag for the implementation. We'll be happy to arrange for funding and I welcome any help we get.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: