Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve handling of measurements in pytket circuit functions #669

Open
tatiana-s opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Improve handling of measurements in pytket circuit functions #669

tatiana-s opened this issue Nov 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tatiana-s
Copy link
Contributor

tatiana-s commented Nov 29, 2024

See #657 for initial issue.

The current implementation doesn't require ownership of the provided qubits, which doesn't line up with the Guppy ownership model.

We could also allow users to optionally add classical input values in the function stub.

@tatiana-s tatiana-s self-assigned this Nov 29, 2024
@tatiana-s tatiana-s changed the title Support circuits with classical bits and measurements in pytket circuit functions Improve handling of measurements in pytket circuit functions Dec 3, 2024
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2024
Closes #657, however the following limitations still exist which are
covered by further issues:
- #669: ~~Classical bits and measurements aren't currently supported as
this requires some checks related to ownership and return values.~~ They
are supported but without taking ownership.
- #670: It would be nice to not have to provide an explicit function
stub for the circuit and also have `load_pytket` method which infers it.
- #671: It would also be nice to be able to provide arrays of qubits in
the function stub.
@tatiana-s tatiana-s removed their assignment Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant