Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider What/Why for a Knowledge Layer connector #21

Open
slawr opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Consider What/Why for a Knowledge Layer connector #21

slawr opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request task Task not fitting other labels, e.g. project ops

Comments

@slawr
Copy link
Collaborator

slawr commented Feb 21, 2024

The Data Architecture team has discussed separation of concerns between the data/information layers and the knowledge layer in a DIKW (Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom) pyramid. Where the data layer is represented by the native vehicle data (e.g. CAN, SOME/IP), the Information layer by the VSS and adjacent data models and the Knowledge/Wisdom layers by reasoning etc.

@chrizmc provided input on one possible use case for the higher levels in the pyramid in the Early Planning https://wiki.covesa.global/display/WIK4/Early+planning#Earlyplanning-Usecasestobeexplored

A proposal has been made for the Playground to have a connector between the Information and Knowledge layers.

BMW have a component that might be open sourced that could be used as a possible implementation candidate and is described here by @claireqiu : https://wiki.covesa.global/display/WIK4/Artifact+JSON-RDF+Converter

The task here is to consider the logical concept for such a connector. Why it is needed and what is should support?

@slawr slawr added enhancement New feature or request task Task not fitting other labels, e.g. project ops labels Feb 21, 2024
@slawr slawr moved this from Next to In Progress in Central Data Service Playground Apr 9, 2024
@slawr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

slawr commented Apr 9, 2024

Set state to "in progress" as @claireqiu @chrizmc are considering a proposal for the AMM workshop

@slawr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

slawr commented Apr 25, 2024

Side meeting held with participants (@claireqiu @chrizmc) at the AMM to discuss the connector and way forward. BMW will reply with updated proposal.

@chrizmc
Copy link
Collaborator

chrizmc commented Apr 26, 2024

@chrizmc chrizmc moved this from In Progress to Done in Central Data Service Playground Apr 26, 2024
@slawr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

slawr commented Apr 26, 2024

Thanks for the reminder @chrizmc. For the what I assume you are referring mostly to the later slides.

I don't think we need to be especially formal about documenting gates between the stages of the work and I agree the presentation does a good job of the motivations, problems and possible goals of the connector. So happy to close.

The kanban should reflect the backlog and work underway so we should seek to capture what the next steps look like. For now I'll put a simple task in the kanban to determine the next steps.

Update: Created https://github.com/orgs/COVESA/projects/8?pane=issue&itemId=61127166

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request task Task not fitting other labels, e.g. project ops
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants