You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The method of calculation of F_complex is different for a magnetic structure, therefore an updated definition of _refln.F_complex should be provided in the magnetic CIF dictionary. There may be other data names like this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This may be solved splitting the structure factor contributions into magnetic/non-magnetic, but in that case the way in which the agreement factor (R factor) is calculated should be changed as the comparison is now between the sum of the two contributions.
I recall extensive correspondence on this issue within the magCIF working group between 17 Jul 2017 and 02 Aug 2017. The decision at the time was to postpone discussion.
The method of calculation of F_complex is different for a magnetic structure, therefore an updated definition of _refln.F_complex should be provided in the magnetic CIF dictionary. There may be other data names like this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: