-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16143] Implement Convert Step Updates #16710
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 6 commits
e5d7a5a
2891d0c
f3e19c0
12aaeb2
48cf73b
63d3649
87e3c7a
466e4d7
7224ee4
270faef
98368f9
d8a5314
44d4b60
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.Coding | |
import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.DateTimeType | ||
import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.DiagnosticReport | ||
import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.Extension | ||
import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.MessageHeader | ||
import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.Observation | ||
import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.Patient | ||
import org.hl7.fhir.r4.model.Property | ||
|
@@ -116,6 +117,26 @@ fun Bundle.addProvenanceReference() { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Return true if Bundle contains an ELR in the MessageHeader. | ||
* | ||
* @return true if has a MesssageHeader that contains an R01 or ORU_R01, otherwise false. | ||
*/ | ||
fun Bundle.isElr(): Boolean { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. RS currently receives test orders and results. Instead of Implementing detection for There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Added some code for this with only LAB_RESULT or UNKNOWN as options. Future features will need to add additional values to the enum. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Have we tried moving the logic here into There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. My thought on this is that, if we intend to add several potential groupings (i.e., enums in RSMessageType), then getRSMessageType would become quite large. Keeping just meaningful function names related to the message grouping type makes the switch statement clearer in my opinion. Additionally, there is an old programming rule of thumb that goes something like "no subroutine should be longer than one screen in length". This, obviously, is rather vague but speaks to keeping code segments small to increase "understandability". You'll often see this argument backed by references like The Magic Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sure, I just think in practice in this case this won't be longer than a page etc and the downside is you'll be copy pasting this function most likely and just changing the if check in it (violating the DRY principal). That said, there is no repeated code right now, so I'll leave this as a "nit" and we can refactor if needed when we expand if you'd like. |
||
var isElr = false | ||
if (this.type == Bundle.BundleType.MESSAGE && this.entry.isNotEmpty()) { | ||
// By rule, the first entry must be a MessageHeader | ||
arnejduranovic marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
val resource = this.entry[0].resource | ||
if (resource is MessageHeader) { | ||
val event = resource.event | ||
if (event is Coding && ((event.code == "R01") || (event.code == "ORU_R01"))) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. are there other codes that could be ELR in the future? Throwing those codes into a set to check against would make this a bit more readable. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's unknown at this point. I suspect not right now, though. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Unlikely |
||
isElr = true | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
return isElr | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Gets all properties for a [Base] resource recursively and filters only its references | ||
* | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
comment not needed, the code is clear enough. Try to use comments to explain the "why" not the "what". In this case, no comment is needed imo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cleaned it up.