Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow for execution without a control #102

Open
slsevilla opened this issue Nov 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

allow for execution without a control #102

slsevilla opened this issue Nov 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@slsevilla
Copy link
Contributor

Describe what enhancement you'd like to see.
We currently allow for MACS2 to run without a control - may have situations were a control is not available or it failed sequencing. Valuable data can still be obtained for such a scenario. Because of this, an adjustment should be made to allow for running without a control

@slsevilla slsevilla added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 11, 2023
@slsevilla slsevilla self-assigned this Nov 11, 2023
@epehrsson
Copy link
Collaborator

When needed, we run the pipeline by including a dummy IgG control in the sample matrix (as a sample entry = row and listed as the control for each sample). It is included in the MultiQC report and the DeepTools plots, but otherwise output is separate from that of the true samples.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants