Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create cost tracker from a power entity (vs consumption) #1081

Open
2 tasks done
sshaikh opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
2 tasks done

Create cost tracker from a power entity (vs consumption) #1081

sshaikh opened this issue Nov 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request More demand needed A feature that will be considered if there is more demand

Comments

@sshaikh
Copy link

sshaikh commented Nov 13, 2024

Describe the feature

The OE cost tracker only supports entities that report a consumption value in kwh.

Given power usage should be enough (particularly in an Agile situation), provide support for entities that only expose a current power value.

Expected behaviour

Allow the Cost Tracker flow to accept entities that report power in W, and then present all the usual cost sensors based off that.

Use Case

At the moment my energy monitor only reports the current power usage of the device attached to it, and so a cost tracker cannot be created for it.

Confirmation

  • By submitting this feature request, you agree that you have read the documentation and confirmed it does not already exist
  • I am willing/able to help contribute to the solution of this feature
@sshaikh sshaikh added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 13, 2024
@sshaikh
Copy link
Author

sshaikh commented Nov 13, 2024

In the meantime I've created a integration (ie sum) helper to do the summing of power for me.

@BottlecapDave
Copy link
Owner

Hello and thank you for requesting this. This was not included due to the extra complexity and the fact if this is introduced it would be an estimation tied to the frequency the sensor updates. As there is work arounds, this would require some further demand before being considered.

@BottlecapDave BottlecapDave added the More demand needed A feature that will be considered if there is more demand label Nov 23, 2024
@sshaikh
Copy link
Author

sshaikh commented Nov 23, 2024

Hi - make sense and I agree. Better to let the integration helper do the summing logic.

Happy for you to close if necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request More demand needed A feature that will be considered if there is more demand
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants