Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(inactive) TCMC #3657

Closed
10 tasks
danymukesha opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 8 comments
Closed
10 tasks

(inactive) TCMC #3657

danymukesha opened this issue Nov 19, 2024 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
3b. declined not appropriate for Bioconductor 3d. needs interop Package must explicitly use Bioconductor structures and methods OK

Comments

@danymukesha
Copy link

Update the following URL to point to the GitHub repository of
the package you wish to submit to Bioconductor

Confirm the following by editing each check box to '[x]'

  • I understand that by submitting my package to Bioconductor,
    the package source and all review commentary are visible to the
    general public.

  • I have read the Bioconductor Package Submission
    instructions. My package is consistent with the Bioconductor
    Package Guidelines.

  • I understand Bioconductor Package Naming Policy and acknowledge
    Bioconductor may retain use of package name.

  • I understand that a minimum requirement for package acceptance
    is to pass R CMD check and R CMD BiocCheck with no ERROR or WARNINGS.
    Passing these checks does not result in automatic acceptance. The
    package will then undergo a formal review and recommendations for
    acceptance regarding other Bioconductor standards will be addressed.

  • My package addresses statistical or bioinformatic issues related
    to the analysis and comprehension of high throughput genomic data.

  • I am committed to the long-term maintenance of my package. This
    includes monitoring the support site for issues that users may
    have, subscribing to the bioc-devel mailing list to stay aware
    of developments in the Bioconductor community, responding promptly
    to requests for updates from the Core team in response to changes in
    R or underlying software.

  • I am familiar with the Bioconductor code of conduct and
    agree to abide by it.

I am familiar with the essential aspects of Bioconductor software
management, including:

  • The 'devel' branch for new packages and features.
  • The stable 'release' branch, made available every six
    months, for bug fixes.
  • Bioconductor version control using Git
    (optionally via GitHub).

For questions/help about the submission process, including questions about
the output of the automatic reports generated by the SPB (Single Package
Builder), please use the #package-submission channel of our Community Slack.
Follow the link on the home page of the Bioconductor website to sign up.

@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @danymukesha

Thanks for submitting your package. We are taking a quick
look at it and you will hear back from us soon.

The DESCRIPTION file for this package is:

Package: TCMC
Title: Compare Classification Models
Version: 0.99.0
Date: 2024-11-18
Authors@R: 
    person("Dany", "Mukesha", , "[email protected]", 
  role = c("aut", "cre"),
 comment = c(ORCID = "0009-0001-9514-751X"))
Description: Streamlined approach to train, evaluate, and compare
    different classification algorithms, by offering the user a robust
    framework for model selection in machine learning projects.
License: Artistic-2.0
URL: https://github.com/danymukesha/TCMC, https://danymukesha.github.io/TCMC/
BugReports: https://github.com/danymukesha/TCMC/issues
Imports: 
    C50,
    caret,
    gbm,
    klaR,
    mlbench,
    randomForest,
    SummarizedExperiment,
    tidyverse
Suggests: 
    BiocStyle,
    knitr,
    RefManageR,
    rmarkdown,
    sessioninfo,
    testthat (>= 3.0.0)
VignetteBuilder: 
    knitr
biocViews: Software, Classification, SupportVectorMachine
Config/testthat/edition: 3
Encoding: UTF-8
Roxygen: list(markdown = TRUE)
RoxygenNote: 7.3.2

@bioc-issue-bot bioc-issue-bot added the 1. awaiting moderation submitted and waiting clearance to access resources label Nov 19, 2024
@lshep
Copy link
Contributor

lshep commented Nov 25, 2024

I see you import SummarizedExperiment but do not see where it is utilized? Can you expand the vignette to show how this would integrate into a Bioconductor specific workflow with Bioconductor classes?

@lshep lshep added 3e. pending pre-review changes review has indicated blocking concern that needs attention 3d. needs interop Package must explicitly use Bioconductor structures and methods labels Nov 25, 2024
@danymukesha
Copy link
Author

@lshep
Thank you for reminding me that. You could find the expanded vignette with this recent push: danymukesha/TCMC@34053fa

@lshep lshep added pre-check passed pre-review performed and ready to be added to git and removed 3e. pending pre-review changes review has indicated blocking concern that needs attention 3d. needs interop Package must explicitly use Bioconductor structures and methods labels Dec 4, 2024
@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Your package has been added to git.bioconductor.org to continue the
pre-review process. A build report will be posted shortly. Please
fix any ERROR and WARNING in the build report before a reviewer is
assigned or provide a justification on why you feel the ERROR or
WARNING should be granted an exception.

IMPORTANT: Please read this documentation for setting
up remotes to push to git.bioconductor.org. All changes should be
pushed to git.bioconductor.org moving forward. It is required to push a
version bump to git.bioconductor.org to trigger a new build report.

Bioconductor utilized your github ssh-keys for git.bioconductor.org
access. To manage keys and future access you may want to active your
Bioconductor Git Credentials Account

@bioc-issue-bot bioc-issue-bot added pre-review on bioconductor git and access to on demand build but not assigned reviewer until build report clean and removed 1. awaiting moderation submitted and waiting clearance to access resources pre-check passed pre-review performed and ready to be added to git labels Dec 4, 2024
@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Dear Package contributor,

This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org.

Your package has been built on the Bioconductor Single Package Builder.

Congratulations! The package built without errors or warnings
on all platforms.

Please see the build report for more details.

The following are build products from R CMD build on the Single Package Builder:
Linux (Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS): TCMC_0.99.0.tar.gz

Links above active for 21 days.

Remember: if you submitted your package after July 7th, 2020,
when making changes to your repository push to
[email protected]:packages/TCMC to trigger a new build.
A quick tutorial for setting up remotes and pushing to upstream can be found here.

@lshep lshep added the 2. review in progress assign a reviewer and a more thorough review of package code and documentation taking place label Dec 10, 2024
@bioc-issue-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

A reviewer has been assigned to your package for an indepth review.
Please respond accordingly to any further comments from the reviewer.

@bioc-issue-bot bioc-issue-bot removed the pre-review on bioconductor git and access to on demand build but not assigned reviewer until build report clean label Dec 10, 2024
@PeteHaitch
Copy link

Hi @danymukesha,

I've been assigned as reviewer for TCMC.
I want to let you know that I won't have time to start review this until the new year due to the Christmas / New Year holiday period where I work.

Cheers,
Pete

@PeteHaitch
Copy link

PeteHaitch commented Jan 2, 2025

Hi @danymukesha,

Thank you for submitting TCMC to Bioconductor.
While we appreciate your efforts in developing the package, it is not currently suitable for inclusion in Bioconductor.
Therefore, I am declining the package at this time.
However, we would be happy to reconsider if substantial changes are made that warrant a new submission.

As this decision precludes a full checklist review, I have focused on the major reasons for not proceeding further with the review.
We hope these points are helpful for guiding potential revisions, should you wish to resubmit in the future.

If you have any questions or need clarification on these points, we can continue the discussion in the comments.
However, please note that prolonged discussions are not typical at this stage, so we encourage focusing on significant revisions that address the feedback.

Cheers,
Pete


Current unsuitability for Bioconductor

Lack of Integration with Bioconductor Ecosystem

The package does not demonstrate real integration or interoperability with Bioconductor classes or functionality.
While the vignette includes an example using a SummarizedExperiment, it processes it by decomposing the object into components and passing them individually to TCMC::model_comparer().
This approach means TCMC does not directly operate with Bioconductor's core data structures.

Bioconductor packages are expected to interoperate with the existing ecosystem.
If implementing this integration is not within your scope, you might consider submitting the package to CRAN, which does not have this requirement.

Limited Functionality Beyond Existing Tools

TCMC provides three functions (check_forclass(), model_comparer(), and plot_importance()), which are thin wrappers for functionality already available in caret.
The documentation does not clearly explain why a user would prefer these functions over directly using caret, which supports a broader range of models (beyond the 13 currently supported by TCMC).

This raises concerns about the added value or unique functionality that TCMC offers compared to existing tools.
Clear motivation and justification are essential to demonstrate the necessity and usefulness of the package.

@PeteHaitch PeteHaitch added 3b. declined not appropriate for Bioconductor 3d. needs interop Package must explicitly use Bioconductor structures and methods and removed 2. review in progress assign a reviewer and a more thorough review of package code and documentation taking place labels Jan 2, 2025
@bioc-issue-bot bioc-issue-bot changed the title TCMC (inactive) TCMC Jan 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3b. declined not appropriate for Bioconductor 3d. needs interop Package must explicitly use Bioconductor structures and methods OK
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants