Could you provide a shadowJar version of the Bing API SDK

[suxuan-king1]

Could you provide a shadowJar version of the Bing API SDK? The new version of the SDK depends on several JAR packages that conflict with other frameworks used in our project.
The Google Ads SDK provides a shadowJar version（https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.api-ads/google-ads-shadowjar）, which has brought great convenience for our integration with the Google Ads API.

[xinyuwen2]

Hi, thank you for the suggestion! We won't provide a version-specific shadow jar. Could you try pom_for_shadow_jar.xml to package it? It works well on my local. If you encounter any other issues please feel free to ask here.

[suxuan-king1]

Thank you very much for your attention.
I tried packaging with the shadow jar pom_for_shadow_jar.xml and found that the final generated jar only includes all the third-party dependencies of the Bing Ads SDK, without relocating the package paths, so it didn't resolve the conflict issue. For example, our project depends on com.sun.xml.ws 2.3.3, which conflicts with jakarta.xml.ws 3.0.0 from the Bing Ads SDK. It seems that this is because the relocations rules were not configured in the maven-shade-plugin?

[xinyuwen2]

Just updated pom_for_shadow_jar.xml to relocate all dependencies. Noticed that the META-INF/cxf/bus-extensions.txt file aren't aggregated properly and loaded properly and the class names cannot be relocated by ServicesResourceTransformer. I added my-bus-extensions.txt to replace it. Could you try it again?

[suxuan-king1]

Thank you for your attention.

1. It seems that some directories and packages were not successfully shaded, as shown in the image.
2. Resource files were also not successfully shaded, such as META-INF/cxf/org.apache.cxf.bus.factory.
3. my-bus-extensions.txt does not seem to be a good solution. Could it potentially lead to hidden issues when upgrading Apache CXF in the future?
   

[xinyuwen2]

Hi, thank you for pointing out these issues. I updated the pom to relocate all packages.

For META-INF/cxf/org.apache.cxf.bus.factory, I don't find a transformer to process it. Looks like cxf is so special and it's not easy to relocate. Also I agree that my-bus-extensions.txt is not a good but let's treat it as a temporary solution. I'll update it if there's a better way. However, even the resource files under META-INF/cxf are not shaded, the package works well for me. If you're encountering some issues please tell me.

Btw there's one thing confused me, seems in google shadowJar it doesn't relocate any packages. Wondering why it can solve conflicts...