Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve ReadMe #22

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Improve ReadMe #22

merged 10 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

Tortar
Copy link
Contributor

@Tortar Tortar commented Oct 13, 2023

The Build Status wasn't working so I removed it. Unfortunately redef doesn't work on >1.8 so I don't know if mentioning it is a good thing (I spent sometime trying it and asking myself why it didn't work), the author said it's probably not fixable here: FedericoStra/RedefStructs.jl#4

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (0fab8ef) 98.86% compared to head (de2b659) 97.41%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #22      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.86%   97.41%   -1.45%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines          88      116      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits           87      113      +26     
- Misses          1        3       +2     
Files Coverage Δ
src/ProtoStruct.jl 97.39% <96.15%> (-1.46%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Tortar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tortar commented Oct 13, 2023

I'm also asking myself why tests get always cancelled

@Tortar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tortar commented Oct 13, 2023

ok now this doesn't happen with the change on CI.

Does the library need to test so many versions? Can we remove the 1.6? And is testing nightly a good thing? see https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-do-packages-run-continuous-integration-tests-on-julia-nightly/101208/3

@BeastyBlacksmith
Copy link
Owner

ok now this doesn't happen with the change on CI.

Does the library need to test so many versions? Can we remove the 1.6? And is testing nightly a good thing? see https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-do-packages-run-continuous-integration-tests-on-julia-nightly/101208/3

I do think it is good practice to test the lower and upper bound of your compat range. Nightly is not as important and shouldn't cause tests to get cancelled, which I fixed. But it is niceto get a heads up, if things break, ideally there would be a way to test on the latest release candidate, but I am not aware of that.

@Tortar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tortar commented Oct 16, 2023

Ok, perfect, then I think with your latest improvements this is also good to go. Can you release a new version after that? Since #23 is very good to have for the integration in Agents.jl

@BeastyBlacksmith BeastyBlacksmith merged commit fd8b56a into BeastyBlacksmith:master Oct 16, 2023
11 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants