Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change comment of [qyy-1] #115

Open
michaelrabenberg opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Change comment of [qyy-1] #115

michaelrabenberg opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@michaelrabenberg
Copy link

The comment of this axiom should be changed:

(cl:comment "for every process there's a corresponding spatiotemporal-region [qyy-1]"
(forall (p)
(if
(exists (t)
(or (instance-of p process t) (instance-of p process-boundary t)))
(exists (s) (occupies-spatiotemporal-region p s)))))

It should instead say "for every process or process boundary there's a corresponding spatiotemporal-region."

In fact I think there's an even better revision available: "for every process or process boundary there's a corresponding spatiotemporal-region that it occupies." But at least the first revision should be made.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant