Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improved support for non-microsoft community activity via discussions instead of issues #213

Open
vigouredelaruse opened this issue Apr 26, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@vigouredelaruse
Copy link

folks are reporting that modern sdk versions are unsupported by this library for their use case.

since 2015 there has been a corresponding bent in the issue library relating to a dearth of commits, and a handing off by microsoft.

thus it's likely that issues relating to library entropy/atrophy would be better served by (the github) discussion format, resulting in better filtering of issues vs discussions

so really this is a request for enabling of discussions on this repo.
regards

@PeterLavreniuk
Copy link

Hello everyone!
This is a great idea! Meanwhile a lot of "issues" looks like improvements or discussion threads.
Like you said the best way is to filter existing issues.
It will also be great to hear feedback from developers. Perhaps this library has more issues than we can find in the github repository.

@vigouredelaruse
Copy link
Author

indeed. there are fundamental issues with the library at this point. for instance the split-merge tool last times i checked depended on classic azure vm deployment. if anybody's using it perhaps it's time to port split-merge to a function app or a logic app or derive guidance for why it's necessary or not. there's the business of formal support for .net core. and who knows what the mature end of a roadmap could look like. certainly a roadmap would be someplace to start. etc

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants