We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attempting to build v10.21.0
Alpine Linux 3.17.0 Golang 1.19.3
git clone --depth 1 --branch v10.21.0 https://github.com/Azure/azure-storage-azcopy cd azure-storage-azcopy go build -o azcopy
What appears to be a typo introduced in #2372 causes errors upon trying to build AzCopy from source:
$ go build # github.com/Azure/azure-storage-azcopy/v10/cmd cmd/syncComparator.go:117:77: undefined: syncOverwriteResaonNewerLMT
See above
Patching the file to fix the typo before building allows us to build the release successfully:
$ sed -i 's#syncOverwriteResaonNewerLMT#syncOverwriteReasonNewerLMT#g' cmd/syncComparator.go $ go build -o azcopy $ ./azcopy --version azcopy version 10.21.0
It is apparently implemented in #2414
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, this has been resolved in our dev branch, as part of our next release, we will merge changes in the dev branch into main.
azure-storage-azcopy/cmd/syncComparator.go
Line 117 in b90a900
Closing this for now since we are aware and it will be resolved as part of the next release.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Which version of the AzCopy was used?
Attempting to build v10.21.0
Which platform are you using? (ex: Windows, Mac, Linux)
Alpine Linux 3.17.0
Golang 1.19.3
What command did you run?
What problem was encountered?
What appears to be a typo introduced in #2372 causes errors upon trying to build AzCopy from source:
How can we reproduce the problem in the simplest way?
See above
Have you found a mitigation/solution?
Patching the file to fix the typo before building allows us to build the release successfully:
It is apparently implemented in #2414
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: