Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refresh purview-datamap-rest sdk #31356

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kazrael2119
Copy link
Contributor

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Oct 10, 2024

API change check

APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews.

@azure-rest/purview-datamap

/** Resource for '/lineage/\{guid\}/next' has methods for the following verbs: get */
(path: "/lineage/{guid}/next", guid: string): LineageGetNextPage;
/** Resource for '/lineage/\{guid\}/next/' has methods for the following verbs: get */
(path: "/lineage/{guid}/next/", guid: string): LineageGetNextPage;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if it would have impact on the end user?

@@ -594,17 +547,17 @@ export interface QueryResultOutput {
* The total number of search results (not the number of documents in a single
* page).
*/
searchCount?: number;
"@search.count"?: number;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you check the swagger or typespec for this?

*/
relationshipCategory?: string;
relationshipCategory?: RelationshipCategoryOutput;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why this is changed from extensible enum into fixed enum?


const client = getClient(baseUrl, credentials, options) as PurviewDataMapClient;
client.pipeline.removePolicy({ name: "ApiVersionPolicy" });
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is the case where we shouldn't have client level apiVersion because not all operations have this parameter.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants