WIP: modify KML exporter to facilitate analysis of aerobatic maneuvers #1115
Conversation
|
For me it sounds like a intresting feature - but usage should be explained somewhere cause I do not think someone would expect such a feature. Otherwise it could happen that nobody will use it cause nobody knows about?! |
|
@Arne-W Thanks for looking at this. I've always wondered whether anyone else is using the KML export feature... I'll post a question on discuss to see if there's any interest. |
|
Please go ahead with this @kd0aij And we need to have it on the wiki, and also a Blog post ;) |
|
I like it. :) |
|
here is what I see .. https://youtu.be/2n0eM7CG85E do you have any suggestions as to what may be wrong ? |
|
That's disappointing. Google Earth Pro doesn't even run properly on my Ubuntu 16.04 machine though. I used Google Earth 7.1.8.3036 (64-bit) with OpenGL. For some reason, you're seeing huge icons (they shouldn't overlap at 2 meter spacing). And the KML animation demos that I've tried recently don't work properly for me either, so I'm reluctant to invest a lot of effort in something that flaky. Maybe it would be more worthwhile to switch to Cesium for this? The PX4 guys recently added Cesium animations to their log analyzer, and that is closer to what I wanted to achieve anyway: https://review.px4.io/3d?log=54f72ade-68f5-40b7-97e0-f51dcb95b7d2 Perhaps there is someone on the team who knows how to use Cesium? |
|
@kd0aij Yes, Also - I have both Google Earth 7.1.x and this Pro one I just installed ... I agree, using Cesium would solve a lot of this weird things, not to mention Google's sloppy Linux compatibility (I know others that had to hop thru a lot of rings to make Google Earth run on Linus) |
|
@AndKe Thanks, I had forgotten that there was a mavproxy module for Cesium. That looks like a better way to go, and it might be easy to add an export from apmplanner. |
|
Cool - if you are convinced that Cesium is the better way to go we should do it. Adding a new log exporter should be easy (not taking into account the complexity of the exporter itself). @billbonney As our chief mainatiner 😉 - what do you think? @kd0aij If you want to start making a proof of concept be aware that the Logformat will support scaled data in the near future - don't know if it has an impact for such an exporter. If you need further information you should look here #1089. If you need further information let me know (implementation is nearly completed - exporter do not support it until now) |
|
An idea; The data from AP2 could then be sent to mavcesium as a "playback" that could be started, stopped, , reversed , moved step by step... using controls in AP2 Think of it: one could "playback" the moment of a failure based on finding it in log, and step thru it, watching a graph cursor move as mavcesium would show it ... every moment would be visible in graph with lots more related data from the same moment as cesium dislpayed it.. THAT would be totally awesome ! :) |
|
Nice Idea - BUT at the moment the log export works on dataflash logs not on Mavlink logs and there is no support in AP2 to convert dataflash to mavlink. Moreover it looks like a LOT of work and - to be honest - at the moment there are not enough developers supprting AP2 to implement such a cool big new feature.... But you are right - That would be awesome! |
|
I did not mean to convert it to mavlink.. only send attitude, altitude,
position heading... And basic data for PFD .
And I do see it's a pile of work, but maybe less than inventing an export
plus import solution.
…On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, 15:34 Arne Wischmann, ***@***.***> wrote:
Nice Idea - BUT at the moment the log export works on dataflash logs not
on Mavlink logs and there is no support in AP2 to convert dataflash to
mavlink. Moreover it looks like a LOT of work and - to be honest - at the
moment there are not enough developers supprting AP2 to implement such a
cool big new feature....
But you are right - That would be awesome!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1115 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZpqrlzYNs7t5fgAc2mcbMlOtUeDU3sks5tqePbgaJpZM4TC5OI>
.
|
|
@AndKe Lately I've been using GEpro on Win10 to analyze KML files generated in APM2, and the model scales are OK for me. Maybe you're seeing a bug in the Linux implementation? |
|
Yes, that is how it should work, the plane icon is HUGE on Linux version, I notified Google, but can't count on it being fixed anytime soon ... |
|
No, the plane is a Collada model which is copied into the KMZ file from here: |
|
seems ok on MacOS GGL Earth Pro |
Arne-W
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8e8ef6c
to
6bd09e4
Compare
This PR automatically segments the flight path into "maneuvers" bounded by straight and level flight.
GE can animate this flightpath using a feature called "tours", and that might prove useful for log analysis.
Sample screencapture of the animation: https://youtu.be/yAhzkvxIJVs
Example KMZ file is here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1DXqYigl2Eek_ZoIoXqK3eNfPJBOrbrEU
Download the file and open it in Google Earth, set the touring options as shown below:
then select the "tour" named maneuvers (leave the checkboxes as they were) and click the "play tour" button at the bottom of the "Places" sidebar:
Also, clicking on the flightpath will pop up info including RPY angles, AOA, and speeds (exported at 5Hz):
