Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with quota #68

Open
Leicas opened this issue Mar 17, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Issue with quota #68

Leicas opened this issue Mar 17, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@Leicas
Copy link

Leicas commented Mar 17, 2019

I've seen severall mention online of issues with btrfs quotas, is there a way to make buttersink without using quota ?

I'm trying to sink to a remote ssh and by activating quota on that machine it almost always crash at some point with btrfs-cleaner using all cpu and memory... (lot of snapshots and arround 12TB of storage).

@eugene-bright
Copy link
Collaborator

It's known btrfs feature (cough, cough). See #38

You should try Linux kernels >=4.20

@eugene-bright
Copy link
Collaborator

There is also experimental branch (#60) of buttersink that uses timestamps to select base snapshots and do not rely on quotas. I do not have time to bring it to the master.

@Leicas
Copy link
Author

Leicas commented Mar 18, 2019 via email

@eugene-bright
Copy link
Collaborator

If you are going to give my branch a try you should update both sides as new field was introduced in RPC return record (otime).
But you should use it on your own risk. A lot of things is known to be broken.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants