You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your great work!
I have a question when using your ResNet50 model as pretrained weights of Faster R-CNN in Detectron2: your 21K pretrained weights gives 8 point lower mAP than MSRA 1K pretrained one. Before I loaded your 21K pretrained weights into the Faster R-CNN in Detectron2, I noticed that your ResNet50 was trained by input whose value is between 0 and 1 (this is achieved by dividing 255 in pixel-wise manner in your code), but the input in Detectron2 was normalized by substractig pixel mean value and dividing std value in ImageNet, so I set the pixel mean value to 0 and std value to 255 in Detectron2. Although I have done above steps, performance of Faster R-CNN based on your 21K pretrained model still lays far behind MSRA's 1K pretrained one. So I want to know is there some problems I ignored?
Sincerely waiting your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
miznchimaki
changed the title
When using your ResNet50 pretrained model on ImageNet21K in Dtectron2, performance degrades
When using your ImageNet21K pretrained ResNet50 model in Dtectron2, performance degrades
Feb 19, 2022
miznchimaki
changed the title
When using your ImageNet21K pretrained ResNet50 model in Dtectron2, performance degrades
When using your ImageNet21K pretrained ResNet50 model in Detectron2, performance degrades
Feb 19, 2022
Thanks for your great work!
I have a question when using your ResNet50 model as pretrained weights of Faster R-CNN in Detectron2: your 21K pretrained weights gives 8 point lower mAP than MSRA 1K pretrained one. Before I loaded your 21K pretrained weights into the Faster R-CNN in Detectron2, I noticed that your ResNet50 was trained by input whose value is between 0 and 1 (this is achieved by dividing 255 in pixel-wise manner in your code), but the input in Detectron2 was normalized by substractig pixel mean value and dividing std value in ImageNet, so I set the pixel mean value to 0 and std value to 255 in Detectron2. Although I have done above steps, performance of Faster R-CNN based on your 21K pretrained model still lays far behind MSRA's 1K pretrained one. So I want to know is there some problems I ignored?
Sincerely waiting your response!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: