Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Assignment and Meetup Timelines #16

Open
jdantonio opened this issue Dec 31, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Assignment and Meetup Timelines #16

jdantonio opened this issue Dec 31, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@jdantonio
Copy link
Member

Assignment Timeline

Meetup Timeline

@jonknapp
Copy link
Contributor

jonknapp commented Jan 7, 2015

If you're a Wunderllist person, I published this assignment timeline for others to use. Click an item for links.

https://www.wunderlist.com/list/144666008

@rpottsoh
Copy link

rpottsoh commented Jan 7, 2015

@jonknapp thanks for organizing all this on Wunderlist!

@pzula
Copy link
Contributor

pzula commented Jan 17, 2015

@jdantonio I had a question about the video lecture numbers -- Lecture 1 and 2 means 4 videos, Lecture 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, correct? Breaks down to two lectures per week? Or am I wrong? Because if we did do it this way, by the time we got to our March retro we'd almost be done with the course

@jdantonio
Copy link
Member Author

@pzula Unfortunately, the video lectures do not align with the reading lectures. The classroom-based course has 26 lectures covering the first three chapters of the book, outlined here. The 20 video lectures were produced by and HP and cover all chapters of the first edition of the book, outlined here. The eight reading lectures we've mapped out for now until March cover the first chapter of the book and a little bit of the second. As far as I can tell, this aligns with video lectures 1A, 1B, and 2A (and maybe 2B).

@jdantonio
Copy link
Member Author

@pzula We may find that this pace is too slow and, if so, we can talk about picking up the pace. But the chapters we're covering have a ton of content and problems. Everyone liked the idea of requiring only ~3 problems per week. If we moved faster I don't think 3 problems would adequately cover all the material for each week.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants