Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Order expiration block numbers are sometimes reported incorrectly in the client #15

Open
JonathonDunford opened this issue Mar 27, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@JonathonDunford
Copy link
Member

Issue by lampshade9909
Monday Feb 26, 2018 at 03:20 GMT
Originally opened as https://github.com/forkdelta/forkdelta.github.io/issues/105


#The API seems to report the correctly expire date. So the problem may be with the client or whatever node/source the client gets the current block number from.

In this particular case, this number is too big, by a hundred thousand or more.

screen shot 2018-02-25 at 7 18 17 pm

@JonathonDunford
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by freeatnet
Tuesday Feb 27, 2018 at 09:34 GMT


@lampshade9909 Hmm. Could you post steps to reproduce it or some logs of what the order data was?

@JonathonDunford
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by lampshade9909
Monday Mar 05, 2018 at 02:44 GMT


So I've tried reproducing it and I'm getting more confused. I can't tell it only happens sometimes, or only in some markets or what. Right now it's happening in the EOS market (for this order at least, not sure if it's order dependant) but not the PPT/OMG market, no idea why. I made a video. It's not sped up, so in this case, it ticks down by about 50 blocks in about 10 seconds. Notice the blocks aren't ticking down by 1, but instead by ~50 or so. Almost like there's some funky multiplier in there by accident. Is there any logic in the client that's doing a conversion on the expires value? If so, maybe it's converting it wrong under some circumstance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wee_csmwfJQ

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant