JS Adagrams

Major Learning Goals/Code Review

Criteria	yes/no, and optionally any details/lines of code to reference
Correctly uses variables, and only uses `const` and `let` variables. The program prefers `const` variables. The program never uses `var`.	✔️?
Practices best-practices in JavaScript syntax. There are semi-colons at the end of most lines that need semi-colons. Variables and functions are named with camelCase.	✔️?
Correctly creates and calls functions within an object with proper syntax (parameters, return statements, etc.)	✔️?
Uses correct syntax for conditional logic and iteration	✔️?
Practices git with at least 3 small commits and meaningful commit messages	✔️?
Utilizes unit tests to verify code; tests can run using the command `$ npm test test/adagrams.test.js` and we see test successes and/or failures	✔️?

Functional Requirement	yes/no
For the `drawLetters` function, there is an appropriate data structure to store the letter distribution. (You are more likely to draw an 'E' than an 'X'.)	✔️?
Utilizes unit tests to verify code; all tests for `drawLetters` and `usesAvailableLetters` pass	✔️?
Utilizes unit tests to verify code; all tests for `scoreWord` pass	✔️?
Utilizes unit tests to verify code; all tests for `highestScoreFrom` pass	✔️?

Overall Feedback	Criteria	yes/no
Green (Meets/Exceeds Standards)	5+ in Code Review && 3+ in Functional Requirements
Yellow (Approaches Standards)	4+ in Code Review && 2+ in Functional Requirements, or the instructor judges that this project needs special attention
Red (Not at Standard)	0-3 in Code Review or 0,1 in Functional Reqs, or assignment is breaking/doesn’t run with less than 5 minutes of debugging, or the instructor judges that this project needs special attention

Was the code particularly impressive in code style for any of these reasons (or more...?)