Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Will not work on SDS800X-HD, solved in my fork. #8

Open
hb020 opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Will not work on SDS800X-HD, solved in my fork. #8

hb020 opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@hb020
Copy link

hb020 commented May 1, 2024

..since that scope uses UDP instead of TCP for the port mapping, and this script does not fully respect the port mapping protocols by only offering mapping on TCP. (a "good" implementation sets up port mapping on both TCP and UDP). In my fork, I added UDP mapping.
It is still not a "good" implementation in the sense that it is either on TCP, either on UDP, not both.

Opened a PR (#9), that also has other stuff in it, like support for Rigol DG992, via ethernet (not over serial)

I based my fork on the work from Don Becker (https://github.com/donfbecker/sds1004x_bode_python3):

  • Python 3 migration (Python 2 is dead)
  • AD9910 Arduino Shield

My repo: https://github.com/hb020/sds1004x_bode/

@hb020 hb020 changed the title Will not work on SDS800X-HD, solved in my fork, WIP. Will not work on SDS800X-HD, solved in my fork. May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant